Only one-third of talent are working with recruiters

35% of candidates surveyed most frequently turn to recruitment firms to find jobs, down from 45% last year — as opposed to 66% who use LinkedIn, Indeed, or other job boards. Professional candidates are the most likely to use recruitment firms (40%), with commercial candidates coming in at 33% and healthcare at 30%. Only 26% of Gen Z candidates are choosing to work with recruiters.

What do recruitment firms need to do to improve the talent experience and stay ahead of the competition — not just other firms, but also 24/7 job boards? Invest in AI that works non-stop in the background to amplify and accelerate the work of their recruiters.

This year’s GRID Talent Trends Survey made one thing clear: AI has already dramatically changed the talent experience for the better. About half of the talent pool have already interacted with AI as part of their job search, and 77% of them had a positive experience. 93% of those who had a positive AI interview experience would keep working with their recruiters, compared to 76% overall and 67% of those who haven’t interacted with an AI voice agent.

AI is changing the standard for speed and responsiveness in recruiting

Three-quarters of candidates have stopped working with a recruiter because the process was too long or there wasn’t enough communication, and 16% said they never even heard back that their application was received. AI is already helping.

AI eliminates the application “black hole”

Overwhelmingly, candidates say that getting a response to every application submitted will be the biggest benefit of AI in recruiting, with 32% calling this the greatest game-changer. Another 13% cited knowing where they stand in the process as the top benefit of AI. Together, that makes 45% of candidates who feel AI will address the feeling that their application has gone into a black hole. They also value that AI can keep them from wasting their time, with 27% saying it moves them through the process quickly and 10% noting AI can help them easily figure out if they are a good candidate for the role.

When asked about their concerns regarding AI, candidates say they worry they won’t get a chance to speak to a real person or that they will be screened out based on inaccurate algorithms. The good news is that these are concerns the industry can address by building and refining the right algorithms and training models on real, successful placement data.

Candidates appreciate the quick response only possible with AI

The number one reason that candidates appreciated a chatbot screening is that they got an immediate response. The second most popular reason was that they moved quickly to the next stage of screening. Combined, more than three-quarters of candidates cited a positive experience because of the speed and responsiveness that resulted from using AI. This is especially important when you consider that 54% of candidates gave up on working with a recruiter because the process was too slow or because there wasn’t enough communication — those are candidates that recruiters could potentially win back in an AI world. One industry leader shared that her firm is already seeing this in practice:

Being able to see that chatbot interaction immediately and get it distributed out to a recruiter has made that turnaround time so, so much faster. We've gotten a lot of positive feedback on just responsiveness.
Recruitment industry chief operating officer

AI voice agents are at least as good as people in early screenings

73% of candidates had a positive interview experience with an AI voice agent, and the number one reason was that the interaction was natural and felt “human.” In fact, 88% of respondents rated the AI interview as equal to or better than a live interview with a person. They also felt like the voice agent gave them a real opportunity to demonstrate their skill and qualifications, perhaps because they were less self-conscious or less focused on interpersonal social cues. This response has been surprising even to some industry leaders we spoke with, one said:

I thought there would be an adverse effect with the screening agent, I thought candidates would find that experience…impersonal, but we haven't had that.
Recruitment industry chief operating officer

AI increases candidate loyalty 30-45%

The results are in, and it is clear that AI is already having a positive impact on candidate loyalty. Use of AI at all results in a 30% jump in loyalty, and a positive experience with AI boosts loyalty by 45%. This data counters the still-pervasive concern that AI may deter candidates from working with recruiters or make them feel like they aren’t getting enough attention. On the contrary, candidates value the responsiveness AI affords them.

Download report highlights

Slow and inconsistent recruitment processes are turning candidates away

With the AI revolution begun but not yet complete, what does it feel like to be a candidate right now? It turns out that most candidates are still satisfied with their recruitment experience, but they do call out some areas that are crucial for their continued engagement and satisfaction. Delivering a smooth experience in crucial areas of the talent journey translates into significant gains in candidate loyalty, especially when they feel like they are being supported in ways only recruiters can offer — like upskilling and redeployment.

Satisfaction with speed and responsiveness of recruiters falls nearly 20%

When we asked candidates to rank what is most important to them in the talent experience, their top choices were the right job opportunities, number of job opportunities, and fast placement. Candidate satisfaction in these areas has fallen in the last year, particularly as relates to speed and responsiveness. Human recruiters simply don’t have the capacity to provide what candidates want at scale in the early stages of the job search process, leaving firms vulnerable to more losses to job boards.

Complicated forms and technology contribute to dissatisfaction

When we looked at the specific pain points that contributed to a negative talent experience, it was clear that candidates found certain systems and processes to be complicated to complete and difficult to access. Forms were too long; websites and apps required too many clicks; there weren’t enough notifications. Streamlining and automating as much of the recruitment journey as possible can address all of these issues. In fact, one notable bright spot is that dissatisfaction with communication during the interview process falls from 40% to 26% for candidates who interacted with an AI voice agent.

All aspects of the talent experience influence candidate loyalty

It remains the case that each stage of the recruitment process has a huge impact on candidate loyalty. As outlined above, the pain points associated with these stages often have to do with speed and complexity, and in most cases can be improved with automation and AI tools. In fact, 85% of candidates whose onboarding experience was automated would keep working with their recruiter. Given that the GRID 2025 Industry Trends Report found that fewer than 50% of firms are automating many stages of the recruitment cycle, particularly in the middle and back office, there is tremendous potential for easy wins that result in an improved talent experience and, by extension, loyalty – in some cases a 60% increase.

Frequent communication remains key to loyalty

It is a perennial truth that candidates value regular and helpful communication from their recruiters — that is just as true in this year’s Talent Trends Report. They want recruiters to communicate with them more than once a week. And they want recruiters to reach out with new opportunities before they have even finished the previous assignment. Meeting those expectations can result in substantially higher candidate loyalty — as much as 80% higher.

91% of candidates who upskill remain loyal to their recruiters

About half of candidates have participated in reskilling or upskilling programs offered by their recruitment firms, and these programs have a significant impact on loyalty. 91% of candidates who take advantage of reskilling or upskilling programs would continue working with their recruitment firm, compared to 63% of those who didn’t. And firms are coming up with more and more niche reskilling programs: one firm interviewed shared that they have created a highly successful off-shore welding program that now has a lengthy waitlist thanks to word-of-mouth referrals among the talent community. These are services job boards just can’t offer.

And 87% of candidates working as many hours as they want are loyal to their recruitment firms, compared with 68% of those who wish they were getting more hours. Understanding what candidates want and helping them grow to achieve their goals never fails to keep talent engaged. Another aspect of this extra support for candidates is being able to offer options that might not have been possible without AI matching, expanding the candidate’s horizons. One industry executive described it this way:

A recruiter is able to pick up the phone and say, ‘Hey, I saw that you applied to these three jobs, but I also have these other three jobs that you may not have seen. Would you be interested in those as well?’ So, we're able to provide more options and just really enhance that candidate experience.
Recruitment industry technology enablement executive

Here’s what firms can do differently to compete and win

Recruiters face a demand problem, needing to attract more talent at the top of the funnel. And 54% of temporary or contract workers want to leave the contingent workforce for a full-time job in the next two years. For their part, talent want to feel seen, heard, and valued; to stop feeling like their resumes are going into a black hole.

Ultimately, to cement loyalty and stay ahead of job boards, firms need to do two things: attract more talent to begin with and satisfy even more of the talent they engage by:

  • Tackling the demand problem by using digital and AI tools to provide faster service at the top of the funnel to compete with job boards.
  • Deploying all available AI resources to improve the candidate experience throughout the process and differentiate from job boards.
  • Offer the kind of full-service support that only recruitment firms can provide to keep talent skilled at the right level to meet rapidly changing market and client needs.

Methodology

This report is based on survey responses from 2,766 respondents who have worked with a recruitment firm at least once in the past three years, as well as qualitative interviews conducted with five recruitment industry professionals. Responses were collected in North America, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Belgium, Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. The sample is heavily weighted toward North America. Responses were collected from June to July 2025. Participants were recruited through a third-party survey service and completed the survey online. All responses were collected confidentially.